A number of studies have shown Residency restrictions not only cause a false sense of security for the public, but also cost the states millions of tax dollars in supervisory fees and all the extra man hours, paperwork and everything assocated with the unconstitutaional law.
Not only that, but professionals have done studies, and their reports are widely available which state preventing those people who have served their time, and those who are trying to get a new start after having committed a crime from finding a place to live and a job actually creates more danger in the community by making those who have committed 1 crime to be in mental anguish due to trying to find a place to live and work.
This may cause some to re commit a crime.

This poor ag, bent on pushing legislation which has clearly been proven to be a detriment to the safety of his citizens needs to get with the program. He needs to enlist professionals in his scheme of protection.
He needs to find other ways to poke and prod law abiding citizens.
He needs to find other ways to give hs buddies OVERTIME PAY. Follow the money.. that is why this guy has a … on for this law.

My reasoning is this, Justice Roberts first have to recluse himself, as he was the Prosecutor under Smith v. Doe. I believe that to be a conflict of interest.

Second, to grant the “stay” prior to an appeal is in my opinion a “stall,” and the AG could go on for years before he appealed.

The appeal should be done but not in conjunction with a stay. That is only a “political” move that WOULD stall the State Supreme Court for many years.